Star Trek – The Price of the Phoenix

Jim Kirk scrubbed at his eyes and tried to see, tried to breathe against the sobbing that racked him in uncontrollable spasms, tried somehow to ease the intolerable mass of pain that was his whole body.

It was only a little worse where the big arm crushed him against the massive chest, carrying him now like a child, the single arm looped around his chest and under his thighs, balancing him on one hip, while the other arm reached for something.

Still trying to avoid reading Memory Prime, I looked at my to read shelf and considered my options, all 100+ of them.

Then it caught my eye; I didn’t think I had that one, says I, having obviously missed it when looking for the four Sondra Marshak and Myrna Culbreath novels.  Well, since I’d been feeling a little down I thought, well, they’re usually good for a laugh.

I was right!

The Price Of The Phoenix (1977) is Sondra Marshak and Myrna Culbreath’s first published Star Trek novel and… it’s quite the experience.  Yes yes, it’s not actually in the Pocket Series (it was published under Bantam) but the other two books in the series are and I’ve already read those!  So this is where it all began…eh?

Actually it didn’t all begin here.

The first version of The Price of the Phoenix (and The Fate of the Phoenix) was Never Mourn Black Omne which was privately published and printed prior to reaching an agreement with Paramount and Bantam Books, and is extremely limited edition; it is unknown how widely this book was circulated.  I haven’t read it myself (I think it would probably have to be a lucky ebay find!) but from an excerpt found on fanlore.org it seems fairly similar.

The thing is with Marshak and Culbreath is that the more I read their novels, the more I know them as people.  They’re writing ‘Star Trek’ novels, sure, but they end up revealing more about themselves than actually reflecting the characters or the Star Trek universe.  I suppose that actually, quite a few of the earlier Star Trek books have this quality, it gives them a soul which is sorely lacking in some of the more recent releases.  Saying that however, I could probably have done with a bit less ‘soul’ in The Price of the Phoenix.  As I’ve mentioned before, Marshak and Culbreath were not stupid, in fact by all accounts they seem to be incredibly bright.  Culbreath founded her own private academy before selling it and moving down to live with Marshak and her husband.  Marshak earned a Masters degree in history with honours, she was planning a PhD and wanted to write ‘culture changing non-fiction’ and then… she discovered Star Trek and gave it all up to devote herself to the show and writing fanfiction.  Marshak (from the age of 13) was an avowed Objectivist (Ayn Rand) and believed that Star Trek advanced Objectivist ideals.

The idea of Star Trek advancing Objectivism is quite strange, since objectivism at it’s core is right-wing / capitalist; which in many ways Star Trek is not (although I’d argue that even as a post scarcity society, it’s not actually socialist at all.. anyway).  I tried to do a little bit of research on objectivism in order to try to apply it to Price but the work I was willing to do just acting on a hunch wasn’t really enough to get anywhere particularly entertaining.  Superficially however, without going into the nitty gritty of Rand’s philosophy there are some ideas which can be identified as objectivist in the broadest sense.

Anyway, attempting to cut the rambling about pseudo academia short, the most obvious objectivist idea in Price is

the belief that certain things, especially moral truths, exist independently of human knowledge or perception of them. 

and that

“…(Objectivism), in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute.” – Ayn Rand, Appendix to Atlas Shrugged

The concept of the heroic being, is central to the narrative of Price, and actually all their novels I’ve read so far.  The heroic being is invariably Kirk who is basically a cinnamon roll too pure for this world characterised as being Adonis but with the tactical ability of Alexander.  The moral truths are also exemplified by Kirk, who is unaware of his virtue or power although every person who meets him recognises these truths in him.  Kirk is unique because his own happiness -being the captain of the Enterprise- is his moral purpose but also serves a greater purpose which exists dependently of his own will – independent of his knowledge or perception.

Kirk’s purity of purpose is what drives… perhaps it’s better to say ’causes’ the plot.  Omne is attracted to him as a light to his darkness, as a contrasting figure who reminds him of who he was many, many years ago.  The events that take place are not incidental, it’s all planned by Omne in order to take possession of Kirk body and mind; this is central, all other plots and machinations are red herrings.

Like The Entropy Effect which would be noted for the fact it kills Kirk outright in a slashy death scene, Price (which of course is the earlier work) also starts with Kirk’s death and Spock’s emotional response.  We’re told it truly is Kirk who has died, no doubt in McCoy’s mind.  Spock saw Kirk die…   of course he didn’t.  A clone of Kirk was substituted for the ‘real’ one as he was transported away by Omne.  We’re introduced to another clone Kirk who takes the name ‘James’ while the original uses ‘Jim’.  The Romulan commander gets rather fond of ‘James’, though we’re told that she probably got together with ‘Jim’ when she was being transported on the Enterprise previously.  Spock turns into a testosterone filled (or whatever the Vulcan equivalent is) super Vulcan, not quite VULCAN COMMAND MODE, but close.  All the incidents which lead up to the ‘main event(s)’ aren’t really important, the’re just a clumsy method for getting to Marshak and Culbreath’s kinks (which I’ll get to in a bit).  There’s a chase through an under ground labyrinth, lots of sexual imagery, med bay in a bottle (spraycan), nudity, manly ‘vulcanoid’ fighting… and for once both the clone and the original Kirk survive!  The Romulan commander gets ‘James’ and Spock gets ‘Jim’, and everyone lives happily ever after… but they know one day Omne will return… (oh no…)

A more sensible summary of The Price Of The Phoenix on Memory Beta.

I’m not going to waste time summarising this novel seriously, there’s no point since it can be found elsewhere.  I am going waste time looking at the appalling descriptions, hyper sexual imagery, and general kinkiness.  I’m also going to repeatedly wonder how this got published.

So, I’m going to start with picking out a wonderful (?) example of the redundant descriptions which litter this hot mess, because everyone needs to suffer this with me.  At least I suppose they improved over time and sentences like –

“So,” he said with the deceptive mildness which let the deception show through, “that makes it interesting.”

– become less commonplace, but Price is full of them.  When I read a section to my partner, he had to stop me every so often to reread sentences.  Sure, you can work out what they are trying to say, but the descriptions are kinda what you’d expect from a fifteen year old dabbling in fanfiction for the first time; more often than not a horny fifteen year old at that.  Language is very clumsy and at times repetitive –

Kirk felt an odd jolt on some level he couldn’t even name. Or-wouldn’t.  Perhaps somewhere on the level of what he was refusing to name, even to himself.  Let it be blunt, brute fact.

 But this –

Clumsy, repetitive, badly edited.

Not to mention this particular section follows Omne telling Kirk he didn’t want him in the line of fire.  Oh dear.  The big scary vulcanoid wanted to protect the weak pretty earth man, so he carried him off to his secret lair, ministered to his wounds forcefully and erotically.  You know, this is all very familiar; I seem to recall similar events occurring in two other novels by this deplorable duo, and I have little doubt that the next Phoenix book has rather the same kink in it.  I wouldn’t be surprised if Omne erotically beats up Kirk again, Jim or James! Spock will go super angry Vulcan, then they kiss and make up, right?

Speaking of erotic.

I really could dedicate this review(?) to erotic imagery in Price but I’d be even more delayed in  publishing this than I already am.  There are two particular scenes / images that stand out to me.  One has already been mentioned, and that’s the scene where Omne smashes Jim (the original) into a bloody, broken pulp while James (the copy) and the Romulan commander watch.  I don’t even have to go into that James starts to feel the pain of Jim, and then this transmits to Spock.  The one-sided pounding fight between Jim and Omne is pretty much a H/C / sadistic exercise in homo-erotic voyeurism.  I mean, there is no way for Kirk to prevail, Omne is bigger, stronger, more intelligent, described as ‘alpha male’, king of the jungle following jungle laws (that extended metaphor is the cringiest cringe).

Serious cringe.

Oh gosh, I haven’t even mentioned the strange virginity / loss of virginity / rape sections have I?  The clone Kirk is dressed in a white tunic (obviously because he’s pure), but feels all the pain of the original (messiah comparison?).  In one section he slides down a pole (the main transportation through the underground labyrinth), but he has no trousers on so his thighs an nethers are scalded to bloody rawness by the friction from the pole.  So, after that he’s basically walking around in a white tunic, bleeding between the legs… mmph.  How did that get past the editor too?  The original Kirk also feels these injuries… I’m surprised they didn’t go further and describe him sharing that particular violation, or would that make it too obvious?

Anyway.

Let’s just skip to the end.  The Price of the Phoenix is an awful book in any context and really just reinforces what I already knew about these two authors.  I don’t understand how they were able to return again and again to rehash this same story with the same kinks in again and again.  The very worst of it is this obsession with emasculating Kirk repeatedly.  Yes, Kirk does have a soft side which is at times so gentle, but these two seem almost unable to actually write MxM stuff without making one of the characters a surrogate female.  You see this a lot in fiction involving gay men which is written for women.  One of the characters is always the female stand in, and in this case it’s Kirk.

You know, I can’t even say they ‘know’ the series well, because as far as characterisation goes, I don’t believe they do.  It feels like they’ve developed Kirk, Spock and the others into other characters and not the characters they are meant to be.  I could say they they might as well be writing a series with all original characters but then it wouldn’t stand out as having a prevailing sense of all round wrongness.

The Price of the Phoenix only stands out and is worth talking about because of how wrong it all is there is literally no merit in it.  By all means read it out of curiosity, read it because its kinda historical and because it costs a couple of pence to buy… but I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone except those with an interest in early published slash / mxm stuff.

1/5 – bloody thighs, guys.

Star Trek – Chain of Attack

Dr. Jason Crandall lay fully dressed on his bed, futilely trying to decide which was worse – the terrifying nightmare from which he had just awakened or the bleak reality that had replaced it.

Chain of Attack (#32 Pocket, # Titan) (1987) by Gene Deweese is one of those books which is sincerely a pleasure to read.  Almost clinical in its execution, Deweese’s clarity and excellent characterisation is only let down by a slight feeling of detachment as the author takes a ‘hands off’ approach to his characters emotionality.

As I was reading Chain of Attack, it felt very familiar and, looking back at my blog I notice that I have indeed read another book by Gene Deweese – Renegade which is #55 in the Pocket Book series.  Reading that review (from just over a year ago!) confirmed some of the impressions I got from Deweese’s writing; clinical, masculine, and lacking emotional depth paired with strong characterisation, story concept, and effective use of supporting cast.  I do think that Chain of Attack is a stronger story than Renegade however.

Memory Beta Chain of Attack story summary.

Chain of Attack begins with the Enterprise being hurled into a distant region of space via a spacial anomaly that appears to have been created by an ancient (and presumably extinct) species.  Isolated and with no way back home, the Enterprise explores the space around where the anomaly deposited them.  To their horror all the planets they come across have been decimated by weapons of mass destruction and over a long period of time.  Eventually they come across other space faring craft, however they attack the Enterprise on sight… as well as attacking each other.  Fortunately they are not as technologically advanced and the Enterprise has little trouble with dealing with these encounters, bu the crew are horrified by the alien species’ propensity for suicide.

Both species the Enterprise encounters refuse to communicate to either the Enterprise or each other… lost and along in this strange region of space, Kirk finds himself trying to understand these strange and destructive peoples and eventually, attempting to broker peace.

However, there is dissent in the ranks, and Kirk has to fight on two fronts.

It’s funny how different reviewers see different books.  Often when I feel strongly about something I ask my partner (as regular readers of this blog will know) to see if he agrees with me.  Often we do see things the same way, other times he gives me a different perspective.  I also double check myself on goodreads, sometimes a reviewer there will give me a better perspective… and very often I wonder if we’ve read the same book!  Some reviewers have said that they don’t think Chain of Attack has very good characterisation and that Kirk especially is out of character – I think completely the opposite!  To confirm how I felt, I gave my partner a few pages to read and he agreed, the representation of the characters is right on the money.  We both felt that when reading character interactions especially (but not limited to) between the trinity that they were jumping off the page, that it’s like what could have been acted out in, I think, season two of TOS.  I feel like possibly some commenters haven’t seen the series itself recently and so have a different impression/memory of Kirk et al.  The other criticism is one I have made of other Star Trek novels, but I don’t think applies here and that is that it’s not really a Star Trek story and that the characters are bolted onto a general sci-fi story.  I disagree, I think absolutely that Chain of Attack was conceived as a Star Trek story, it even has a character type seen in the original series and an slightly too convenient resolution for that character!

As well as the excellent characterisation of Kirk, Spock and McCoy (I’ll restrict my gushing, lest it get a little repetitive), Deweese’s original character Doctor Jason Crandall is actually a really enjoyable character to get to know.  I mean, he’s infuriating on one hand, but on the other because Deweese lets us ‘see’ his thoughts and thought processes he’s almost understandable but with that you get a kind of tension… you know he’s going to do something but you’re not sure what the something is going to be.  The funny thing is that when he does act it’s a laughable failure, and that is… almost tragic I guess?  Crandall is just so deluded and his understanding of the situation so wrong he ends up being a really effective tragic character.  Even the fact that Kirk writes his attempts at mutiny off as not being particularly worrisome makes the character effective.  I get the feeling that possibly Crandall got some of his character traits at least partially from people who dislike Star Trek, or criticise Kirk as a leader/captain/character.  Certainly I have seen similar commentaries to Crandall’s in articles about Star Trek or various Facebook posts; He isn’t realistic, he has too much ego, he only wishes to satisfy his own sense of adventure, he throws his crews lives away – that kind of thing.  Crandall echoes this commentary, and if I’m right… that’s a fantastic in joke (with a clever tongue in cheek resolution).

I really liked the two alien species that were encountered, I liked how different they were physically but how similar they were mentally.  I liked their individual characterisations, that they didn’t all react in the same way (not all painted with the same brush) even if they were a little bit frustrating for Kirk to deal with.

Near the end of the book an unexpected third species is discovered, and actually an unexpected resolution for Crandall and the Enterprise crew.  Naturally, the crew of the Enterprise return to their original part of the galaxy (with some relieved passengers) and leave behind them the beginnings of peace for the two species they encountered there.

All in all a really solid novel, clean and concise with a very ‘Star Trek’ ending.  My only complaint is that Deweese is very distant emotionally and that is less enjoyable for me, but that being said I did really enjoy Chain of Attack a great deal, and even if you (like myself) like the more emotional novels, this one is worth a read.

It’s not very fun to write about though…?

4/5 – It’s done, I made it!

Star Trek – The Romulan Way

“But if Intelligence learned of what you have just told me, hru’hfirh?”  It struck Arrhae even as she said it that the question was unnecessary, one with an obvious answer.  She was even more right than she guessed.

“Then they could have learned from only one source, and would also learn – from a similarly anonymous source – that my so-trusted hru’hfe is a spy for the Federation, suborned by her late master tr’Lhoell,” said H’daen silkily.  “Tell me, whom would they believe?”  Then he swore and scrambled to his feet with his hands reaching for her shoulders, for Arrhae’s face had drained of colour so fast and so completely that he thought she was about to faint.  “Powers and Elements, Arrhae, it was a brutal answer to the question, but I didn’t mean it!”

The Romulan Way (1987) by husband and wife team Diane Duane and Peter Morwood, is a novel of two distinct parts which is equally fascinating and frustrating.  Fascinating because I love Duane’s Romulans and the thought that went into describing their leaving Vulcan and the subsequent birth of the Rihannsu culture; frustrating because the alternating ‘story’ and ‘history’ chapters cause a ‘stop/start’ narrative which makes it difficult to settle into the story.

I feel those small figures at the bottom feature on many movie posters and book covers from the 1980s.

I honestly do love to read novels by Diane Duane (no experience of Peter Morwood at time of writing), but sometimes I do have to be in the right mood for them.  Subsequently, I didn’t pick this book back up for nearly three weeks after my surgery.  The reason?  The structure really bothered me, I really didn’t get on with the alternating chapters even though I could see the reason to them.  I think they needed to be there to set the ground work for Duane’s Romulans – her Rihannsu.  In order for her story to make sense and I think at this point to set herself up for sequels with her rogue Romulan Commander ‘Ael’, she needed to explain her Rihannsu history.  Since I doubt the powers that be would allow her to produce an independent non-canon Romulan/Rihannsu history book, the necessary history needed to be slipped into a novel, hence The Romulan Way.  The novel in its entirety is really just ground work for further novels, not only is it setting up the Rihannsu past, it is also giving exposition of their culture, their symbolism, language and their ‘current’ political situation ending with Ael taking away an ancient symbol of her people because she didn’t believe they deserved it any longer – they had become too dishonourable.

Memory Alpha in depth summaries

The ‘story’ is quite small scale for Duane, which is necessary since she and Morwood, were putting so much history in.  The blurb at the back of the book describes The Romulan Way as a ‘startlingly different adventure’, although it seems to be more referring to the history aspect, the story narrative itself is also quite different.  For much of the book the characters are all very small.  They aren’t larger than life heroes like Kirk or heinous villains – even McCoy is subdued.  Instead, the characters are fighting their own mostly inconsequential battles, making small overtures, small actions which in the scheme of things for the most part don’t have repercussions.  The main character Arrhae or Terise is one such character.  She is an extraordinary woman – no doubt – but she is just an intelligence officer who hadn’t made a report in two years while undercover as a Romulan.  She works as a housekeeper in a minor house, having worked up from the status of a slave.  She’s been changed so that she looks Romulan, and genetically changed so that she now bleeds green but she is just a Terran human.  Arrhae/Terise has been undercover for ten years living a quiet but hard life, but because of her long silence, Intelligence wants to pull her out, fearing that she’d ‘gone native’ and instigates a plan involving McCoy’s capture in order to make contact with her and bring her back to Earth.

For her part, she doesn’t want anything to do with it.  Her conditioning is so strong she is more Romulan than Human now, but McCoy’s peril at the hands of Romulan justice rouses her to continue her work for the Federation.  Of course, nothing much actually happens of much import in her sections of the story.  Backed up by the history sections, her master’s (and her) actions are explained, but Terise (or more commonly Arrhae) herself is mostly concerned with trying to live her everyday life.  At times it may as well have been ‘day in the life of a house keeper’ (although it is much more interesting than The Remains of the Day).   As such…. it’s somewhat difficult to give a summary of the story without basically telling you what happened blow for blow.

Again what I really liked was Duane/Morwood’s transient characters, the ones that fleetingly visit the narrative, and exit on their own business never to be heard of again.  This I find a real mark of an accomplished writer since there are rounded characters that the author doesn’t feel the need to ‘make a main character’ just because they’ve spent time creating them.  These fleeting characters are a bit of a theme in The Romulan Way however, punctuated with the final actions of an ensign who was only introduced a few pages previously.

I very much enjoyed the dynamic between Arrhae/Terise and her master H’daen.  Much of what you learn about H’daen is through Arrhae’s eyes, she is sympathetic to him and despite their differing status’ he is fond of her.  The end for them is very sweet I feel, and I am very much glad it ended the way it did, although I must admit I expected Arrhae to leave with McCoy since, from my perspective she was up against insurmountable odds.

Something that does bother me is that Arrhae/Terise will be significantly weaker than a Romulan woman (if they retain the strength of their shared Vulcan roots) and she will also be aging faster than the Romulans around her.  Romulans don’t have the lifespan of Vulcans, but they are still able to live some 80 years longer than humans.  Arrhae/Terise notes this a couple of times, so she is aware, but it doesn’t seem like a problem she (or anyone else) dwells on.

The Romulan Way is a good story and a great Romulan/Rihannsu history book.  It’s enjoyable once you get your head around the alternating chapters although perhaps it’s possible to read the history characters first and then read the story?  Perhaps that would be a more enjoyable way to read it?  Either way, if you’ve liked Diane Duane previously, you’ll like this novel too.  I’m not sure how much influence Peter Morwood had on this novel, since it reads like Diane’s hand throughout.  Although I’ll need to read the rest of Diane’s series of Rihannsu books to be sure, I do think that you need to read  this one to make sense of the rest, especially since Ael’s actions at the end are sure to have ramifications for future books.

5/5 – You should read this, mnhei’sahe.

Oh! I almost forgot to mention, a glossary is included at the back to help explain those pesky Rihannsu terms which are untranslatable into English!

Star Trek – TimeTrap

Kirk’s eyes were slowly growing accustomed to the light.  He squeezed them shut, forcing out the tears, and opened them again more slowly.  He had been right: he was surrounded by Klingons.

So Klanth had won.  Kirk realized immediately what must have happened.  Some of the Enterprise Security team had been knocked unconscious in the same way he had been, and the Klingons had been able to overpower the rest and take them prisoner.

There just hasn’t been enough Kirk recently, I thought to myself.  I need more Kirk! This led me to jumping ahead to Time Trap (#40 Pocket, #11 Titan) (1988) by David Dvorkin.  It just happens that this was first released in June 1988 – it was released in the month I was born!

You might remember that David Dvorkin also wrote The Trellisane Confrontation which was released four years previously in 1984.  There are similarities in that ‘the big bads’ are the Klingons, the story is quite small in scope, and although Kirk is treated as a main character (yay!) Dvorkin finds something that he can criticise him for (boo!). 

I actually enjoyed Time Trap quite a bit, even if at alternate times I had this super anxiety and periods of utter annoyance.  Mostly it had to do with Kirk’s characterization, some of which is explained away but I do just think that Dvorkin wants to punish Kirk somehow and it’s not kinky either!!

Anyway Time Trap uses the events of the episode The Tholian Web to explain the strange phenomena that Kirk and his crew encounter.  While on route to a Starbase for some much needed R&R they pick up a distress signal from the boarders of Tholian space.  Naturally the Enterprise investigates the distress signal and finds that it is coming from a Klingon ship which appears to be breaking apart in the center of an unknown spacial disturbance.  The Klingons refuse aid, but Kirk wants to know what they are doing on the boarders of Tholian and Federation space and decides to lead a security team to board the Klingon ship in order to take the commander prisoner.  They beam onto the crippled ship, but almost immediately the ship takes catastrophic damage and the human boarding party and the Klingon crew are incapacitated.  In the meantime, the ship disappears from Enterprise’s sensors and Uhura is suddenly rendered unconscious at her station from an apparent electric shock.  Enterprise itself is attacked by the strange phenomenon, crippling it.  Spock follows orders from Starfleet to leave the area and proceed to the nearest star base for repairs, much to disappointment of the crew who want to look for their captain.  Spock suspects that all isn’t as it seems and proceeds with his own research.

Kirk however finds himself injured and surrounded by Klingons, but these Klingons are different from those he is used to dealing with.  He is told that a temporal phenomenon has resulted in him being thrown one hundred years into the future, where peaceful ‘New Klingons’ are the main faction in the Klingon Empire and have brokered peace with the Federation.  The ‘New Klingons’ are charming and scholarly and Kirk easily becomes friendly with them; this is especially true of a female Klingon who is a historian and who hero worships Kirk – Kalrind.  They quickly become lovers and Kirk finds himself utterly besotted.  However health problems continue to plague Kirk, as he often finds himself often collapsing and weak.

Another scholarly Klingon -Morith- explains to Kirk that he is needed to join these ‘New Klingons’ on a trip back in time in order to ensure that the ‘Great Peace’ come to pass.  On ‘returning to the past‘ it is revealed that everything isn’t as it appears.  An elaborate plot is revealed involving Klingon sleeper agents and an attack on the heart of the Federation – Earth, by Klingons pretending to be part of a peace fleet.  Kirk himself is dying from injuries sustained on boarding the Klingon vessel caught in the disturbance, and the Klingons that were drugged -including Kalrind- are returning to their original selves and it is revealed Spock’s research paid off, as it was a massive cloaking device.  The Klingons are sent packing and McCoy puts Kirk back together again.

One of the things my partner said when I tried to explain Time Trap to him was that it sounded a lot more like a scheme that the Romulans would have come up with as opposed to the Klingons.  I kind of agree that it does seem a little too scheming for the Klingons we know, unless of course you take into account the Klingons from The Final Reflection and Dvorkin directly references parts of The Final Reflection, so I think we can safely say that this book fits in with that continuity and idea of the Klingons.

What I really liked in Time Trap was the ‘time travel’ aspect of it – not that there was any ultimately, it was all a trick, but I did like the thought that had gone into creating a believable scenario for both Kirk and the reader.  I liked how they gradually revealed the time travel scenario, and how because I knew that ultimately the Klingon Empire and the Federation would be at peace (and this is after the start of TNG) I could believe it.  I also managed to rationalise out Kirk’s periods of weakness and illness, putting it down to ‘oh it’s because he’s out of his own time, so that’s why he’ll need to go back to the Enterprise in the end‘, because I know I’ve read something like that before.  When Dvorkin used the time travel theory that they would succeed in going back in time because it had already happened, it was believable.  Kirk believed it too, so.. it all makes sense… right?  But all the while, you’re thinking about a couple of new characters that have been introduced… and Spock’s research, what is Spock’s theory?  Why did Uhura scream and keel over before the Enterprise was attacked by the ‘cloud’ in space?

I didn’t like Kirk’s relationship with Kalrind however.  It made me roll my eyes, really Dvorkin, you’re going to play up to that aspect of Kirk’s personality?  Initially, I thought that Kalrind of an interesting character, as a ‘New Klingon’ she was likeable and the backstory (forward story?) she gave about what it was like in this future was kind of strange but believable.  I liked that she had this aspect of idol worship to her… I didn’t like that the first time Kirk and Kalrind spent any time together at all they kissed and probably a bit more!  I think I was more angry that Kalrind ended up just being the  girlfriend than anything else.  She was interesting as an academic and really sweet, and it would have been fun to have a bit more to their relationship before they end up as an item.  To a certain extent Kirk’s malleability and Kalrind’s personality are all explained away as both of them are drugged – Kalrind has even been ‘reprogrammed’ herself to act the way she does.

I particularly liked McCoy’s characterization, it was just right.  He wasn’t the focus, but he was there in the same capacity as he was in the show and not sidelined by the author.  McCoy had quite a big role to play as regards the exposition of plot and making it clear that Kirk was actually dying from internal injuries and had been cured by medicines from the future.  Anyway, since there has been a Leonard drought recently, I was very happy to see him with an active role in the plot.

Spock was… how many male author’s choose to characterize him, although Dvorkin is a little more sympathetic and makes him slightly more than a talking computer.  In an effort to keep the mystery alive, Dvorkin doesn’t give any insight to Spock’s thoughts which, yes keeps you guessing somewhat however this could also have been achieved with changes to the narrative structure.

Time Trap was a little convoluted at times, which could have been solved with a bit of creative restructuring but on the whole it’s a relatively easy and enjoyable read.  I rather enjoyed being fooled as to the direction the plot was going (because, lets face it I tried to meta the story and for once it didn’t work!) and for that reason alone I’d recommend it!

There are lots of little scenes which are written rather well, and are worth reading the book for in my opinion, although for those who like a bit more introspection in their characters it might seem a little dry.  I’m going to give Time Trap the same score as The Trellisane Confrontation – 3/5 – because although I feel there has been an improvement to Dvorkin’s writing between the novels, I don’t think it is really enough to warrant giving it a higher score.  If you liked his previous book though, you will probably like this one.

3/5 – what a fabulous monobrow… I see Boris is no longer the artist?

Star Trek – Crisis on Centaurus

Kirk ran it through his mind again.  We’re relatively safe as long as we stay in here, as long as Burke knows where we are and feels in control.  If we leave Burke will think he’s losing control, and we’re dead.  But we’ve got to leave.  Now just how the hell are you going to pull this one off, Jim?

First question: Was this novel sponsored by American Express, Coca-Cola, Hilton, and British Airways?

Second question: Did I watch the same Star Trek as Brad Ferguson (author)?

From the outset Crisis on Centaurus (#28 Pocket, #47 Titan) (1986) by Brad Ferguson delivers a quite warped view of the Star Trek future.  I’m not going to pull any punches; the story was pedestrian, characterisation was poor, and understanding of the Star Trek almost nonexistent.

Crisis on Centaurus isn’t getting a good score, that’s for sure.

There were so many things simply wrong about this book, it’s difficult to know where to start.

Summary of Crisis on Centaurus – Memory Beta (as of time of writing detailed but incomplete).

The Story

The story was simplistic and uninspired and hinged upon beliefs and mentalities confirmed to be eradicated by this time in human history.  We know that the concept of money is a little hazy and that we know that racism within humans is pretty much unheard of, and we also know that Alpha Centauri IV (or in this case Centaurus) is a thriving Federation colony (in fact a founding member of the United Federation of Planets).  Much of the narrative of Crisis on Centaurus hinges on Centaurus being somewhat at odds with the Federation and Federation principles so ultimately Crisis is based on a faulty premise to begin with.

Initial conflicts of interest / principles with the Federation are apparent from the first page.  What really stuck on page one was the ‘American Express‘ cash machine.  The use of real big name brands occurs throughout the book and to me indicates not only a lack of understanding of Star Trek but also a severe lack of imagination.  I might have been able to ignore the rampant capitalism if Ferguson had bothered to invent an equivalent but… for me the inclusion of American Express (which highlighted a monetary system), Hilton, Coca-Cola, and strangely British Air(ways) broke my suspension of disbelief.

Stretching for ideas, Ferguson uses racism to try and make his villains more… villainous.  Humans who are not only xenophobic of other species, they are also white supremacists!  So, did we watch the same Star Trek or did we see two different shows?  Star Trek TOS explicitly says racism doesn’t exist within humans two or three times, humans have grown past that.

Additionally, part of the plot is that the planet’s defence system has gone haywire and is shooting nukes at anything that flies…  Sorry, are we part of the Federation or not?

The story is so badly structured and conceived that in order to have an understanding of the motivations of the plot the main remaining villain gives a long winded hypothetical exposition.  Look, Ferguson, if you’ve got to the point where you’ve got to wrap up a book and the only way you can do this is by having the bad guy (who really wasn’t behind the big explosion anyway) tell you everything from the motivations to the execution of the events because otherwise everyone is going to be none the wiser… you’ve failed.

A subplot is that the Enterprises’ computer system has been damaged and it might have been sabotage!  Except it wasn’t and nobody really thought about it too much and took quite a cavalier attitude to the fact there might be a saboteur on the ship, in that nobody actually investigated anything.  As it turns out a tiny black hole winked in and out of existence while the Enterprise was travelling at warp two and that’s what damaged the computer system.  It’s not really investigated until the end.

Ferguson also seems to forget how the chains of command works on the Enterprise and makes a big thing about Uhura being put in charge of the Enterprise (presumably because she’s black or something and it fits with his white supremacists plot point).

Characterisation

Characterisation was poor all round with Kirk having some terrible dialogue and out of character moments, just take a look at this example of sterling writing:

“You can’t afford to sneer, Barclay,” Kirk said.  “You’re too close to being dead right now.  So shut that hole in your face and stay down on the floor.”

 Um… What even is this dialogue?  Much of the ‘character development’ for Kirk revolves around that he’d much rather kill the criminals behind the atrocity but he’s going to do his duty despite his desire to end their lives himself.  Laughable.

Spock gets off lightly and Ferguson puts in a few emotional lapses so he isn’t a complete robot 100% of the time.  No really terrible dialogue that I can recall but nothing wonderful either.

McCoy is barely in the novel, nor is his daughter Joanna.  You’d think there would be character development here, McCoy being worried about his daughter, some exposition through his daughter.  Well Joanna makes an appearance for about 25 pages, McCoy for reasons unknown doesn’t go down to the planet to help until after she is found alive.  Personally I would have thought that nothing would have stopped McCoy from going down to the planet especially since he wouldn’t be going on the transporters since they are non-functional throughout the novel.

An OC nurse however does go down to the planet’s surface in McCoy’s stead.  Her purpose is to provide some cringe inducing dialogue from Chekov and to create some sort of tragic, abortive love affair with him.

Which reminds me every-single-woman is commented on or leched at by Kirk and/or Chekov.  Every time those lines came up I felt like shrivelling up in embarrassment.

The Villains are non-entities.  The scientist who started the blast was a bland nothing, the bad-guys Kirk was trying to save in order for them to be taken to trial and avoid the Centauran death penalty (what?) were bland, uninteresting and ‘the big bad’ was cliched.  The best villains were the government agents, who weren’t villains at all and just wanted to arrest the terrorists under their own laws.  Kirk didn’t like one of them… probably because the government official was competent and doing his job unlike everyone else in this version of Star Trek.

Basically, don’t read Crisis on Centaurus.  It’s a waste of time.  It’s not even a good story, let alone a good Star Trek story.

1/5 – Product Placement.

Star Trek – Dwellers in the Crucible

Some small part of her mind marvelled at the words that came out of her mouth.  She who had been known for the quality of her silences was transformed by her own rootlessness and her need to save one other.

Kaiidth! She would bargain with the Klingon and she would win, though the winning kill her.  The crucible of the t’hy’la could also immolate. 

Dwellers in the Crucible (#25 Pocket, Giant #2 Titan) (1985) by Margaret Wander Bonanno is very much the spiritual successor of its two cited inspirations The Final Reflection by John M Ford, and My Enemy, My Ally by Diane Duane.  Not only does Bonanno use the concepts of the Klingon and Rihannsu (Romulan) empires explored in Ford and Duane’s respective novels, but she also minimises the impact of the Enterprise crew and characters, instead telling a story where the cast we know are incidental and two original characters take the fore.

I have to admit, I initially skipped over this one because I thought it wouldn’t be an easy read, especially if it did follow in the footsteps of The Final Reflection and My Enemy, My Ally.  Truth be told, I was right, however the two mentioned instalments turned out to be fantastic, so what was I worried about? 

Margaret Wander Bonanno was already a professionally published author having penned three novels previous to Dwellers in the Crucible.  She is a talented writer and her previous experience in world crafting and character development is clear from the outset of Dwellers and her previous independence leads her to create an adventure within the Star Trek universe, using lore from other successful authors, but outside of the usual tinted lens of the Enterprise and her crew.

However, however, although Dwellers in the Crucible has the pedigree: good material, talented writer, good characters, it doesn’t have the illusive something, that little bit of stardust which would elevate it into something (in my opinion) great.

Have you ever read The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro?  There’s a film of it too starring Anthony Hopkins and Emma Thompson.  It’s a very clever book; cleverly written, a sad character analysis with a sad, hopeless ending.  It’s a prize winner, a literary masterpiece – it is also one of the most dull, unrewarding, uninspiring books I have ever read.  It’s a lesson in drudgery, of patience and dogged determination, AND frankly if a reader manages to get through it on their own steam they should reward themselves (a slice of cake will do) because you get not a jot from the book.  The film isn’t much better, brilliant but good grief I shall not watch that exercise in dreary fatalism again!

Why have I told you about The Remains of the Day?  Well.. Dwellers in the Crucible elicits the same feelings from me.  I love the fact Bonanno knows how to write, I love that it’s a ‘quality’ book, I like it’s cleverness, it’s structural peculiarities, I like the different focus.  I also think it is rather unrewarding and often painfully dull.  I can’t truthfully call it bad (it simply isn’t), but I also can’t say I enjoyed it (because I didn’t).  I’m glad I read Dwellers but on the other hand I had to force myself to pick it back up; the experience can probably be summed up as all stick and no carrot.

The Story

Dwellers in the Crucible is a story of captivity, friendship and survival of powerless civilians.  It’s not a pleasure to read; it is heavy going and often hard to continue.  It contains torture, sadism, murder and suicide, but also loyalty, self sacrifice, compassion and love.

The Federation has adopted an initiative based on an ancient Vulcan practice – The Warrantors of Peace – an important person or people to the current world leaders are held hostage with a capsule embedded in their hearts which will detonate if removed or if the planet commits an act of war/violence on another.  The concept boils down to the threat mutually assured destruction should one planet commit an act of violence toward another (an agreeable cold war?).

The Romulans and Klingons in their uneasy alliance, formulate a plan to kidnap a number of Warrantors in order to destabilise the peace of the Federation.  Once the Romulans kidnap the Warrantors they are passed into the hands of the Klingons (frankly a terrible idea on the part of the Romulans) who amuse themselves by torturing their civilian charges whom they have under their control for about six months.

Meanwhile the Enterprise is on ‘standby’.  Sulu is dressed up as a Romulan and sent undercover in the Empire (which we barely hear about), Scotty gathers information from the Klingons, and Uhura sets about sowing incorrect information for the Romulan listeners to decipher.  Kirk… well Admiral Kirk is getting rather agitated about the whole thing, while Spock keeps him company?

Eventually the remaining Warrantors are saved, and Kirk and Spock see a reflection of themselves in the two women.  The Federation finally decides this whole ‘Warrantors of Peace’ concept was a terrible, terrible idea and is in the process of scrapping the whole program by the end of the book.

The overarching story isn’t at all well developed.  Some reviewers have had a problem with the ‘Warrantors of Peace’, however the Federation is capable of doing remarkably stupid things so I can give it a pass… plus the Vulcans suggested it so I can conceivably imagine the Federation diplomats and higher ups agreeing it was a good idea.  Other problems include the under developed Sulu mission which could have been a book all by itself, Admiral Nogura’s strange decisions about what Kirk should or shouldn’t be doing, and the fact that the Enterprise is left idling for six months.  I imagine Kirk was climbing the walls!  However, Dwellers in the Crucible is not concerned with ‘the big picture’, but with the relationships between the Warrantors, and the Warrantors and their captors.

The Crucible(s)

The term crucible in the title applies to different aspects of the story, but is most strongly summed up in the following quote:

The Vulcan friendship mode is a crucible.  There is that in it which can purify, refine, strengthen.  There is also that which can immolate, destroy.

Just remove the reference to ‘the Vulcan friendship mode’ (I really hate the ‘mode’ terminology since Vulcan Command Mode) and replace it with ‘love’.  Love is the crucible.  Poignantly this novel is set between TMP and TWOK, and in TMP love is the word which is never mentioned except in euphemism.  In Dwellers, love of the same flavour as Kirk and Spock’s is explored – t’hy’la – through the guise of two women, Cleante al-Faisal – a human female, and T’Shael – a Vulcan female. 

However, love isn’t the only crucible in Dwellers, although it is the most poetic.  There are several events which act as crucibles, some are in the novel’s ‘present’ others in the characters’ pasts.  The shared pasts of Cleante and T’Shael (which is a significant portion of the book) highlights moments of change which would eventually lead them to the realisation of their status of t’hy’la.  Some of the moments of dramatic, others are moments of understanding for one, or both of them.

I think the most obvious ‘crucible’ is their prison on the abandoned planetoid – certainly a place which can purify, refine, strengthen or immolate and destroy.  The situation as engineered by the Klingons (or specifically Kalor) causes the deaths of the three Deltans.  The Deltans lived for love both physical and mental however in the crucible that love destroyed them.  On the other hand, the pressure felt by Cleante and T’Shael to save the other caused both of them to be forged into something better both as individuals and as a unit.

Cleante & T’Shael

Cleante and T’Shael are Kirk and Spock’s stand ins respectively.

What makes it quite interesting however is that Cleante and T’Shael are civilians and come from very different backgrounds to Kirk and Spock.  I think it would be interesting to speculate what changes there would be to this story if they weren’t civilians or if it was Kirk and Spock in this same situation… No doubt there there is a fanfiction on this subject somewhere.

I can’t talk too much about the characters without giving away too much of their story.  However Cleante is very much an impulsive, young, human woman with altogether too much pride; T’Shael is a reticent, reserved young fully Vulcan woman who is humble and ‘known for the quality of her silences’.  Both women come from less than ideal families, Cleante’s mother never affectionate and work driven while T’Shael’s parents are dead – her uncaring mother died on the Intrepid while her father died of an incurable wasting disease.  However, both women are incredibly lonely and this loneliness brings them together despite their difference.  I think this is also what is brings Kirk and Spock together initially, command is a lonely place.

I think it interesting that although Cleante and T’Shael are the analogues of Kirk and Spock, that they are not copies.  T’Shael is humble however Spock has great pride (as I think most Vulcans do), while Cleante is prideful while Kirk will lower himself for the greater good.  These differences in both relationships evaporate however when they are truly ‘bonded’ and when the other is in danger both pairs gain the capacity for great self sacrifice.

I think perhaps most women will find something of themselves in either or both Cleante and T’Shael, perhaps that’s what made their situation (their captivity and torture) so horrible to read about.  It’s much easier to read about the appalling treatment of a male hero character; it’s not so close to home and you know that the hero character is trained for this and they can handle it.  In Cleante and T’Shael’s situation you don’t have any of that reassurance, you’re wondering when they are going to break.  I think it’s most galling because you can’t even put your trust in Vulcan fortitude, you’re wondering when T’Shael will break too, not just the highly strung human.

Ford’s Klingons and Duane’s Romulans

To me it seems odd to set out to use existing lore by other novel writers and then use so little of it that it almost seems wasteful to have considered it in the first place.  Although there are nods to Ford and Duane’s ideas, the Klingons and the Romulans remain more Bonanno’s creations that the other writers.

Ford’s Klingons were sly gamemasters, and if a Klingon should rise through the ranks from a lowly background you’d expect them to be intelligent – not so apparently.  Krazz is one of the more stupid villains despite his rise to a position of power.  Ford spent much of his novel The Final Reflection giving a different reading of the Klingons, trying to find common ground that perhaps even Kirk could in some way empathise with.  However Krazz and Kalor (Krazz’s second in command) are simply exactly like you expect a Klingon to be – and to be honest, if I were Kirk the actions of Krazz and Kalor would have closed me down to any possible positive feelings towards the Klingon species.  Kalor is the worst of the two, a cruel sadist who engineers the deaths of the three Deltans under the premise of science.  Lets face it, if he was a ‘scientist’ doing experiments on rabbits and enjoying causing them suffering, you wouldn’t want to know him right?  Ok, well now apply that to three Deltans, one of which is a child.  No Bonanno, he can’t have my sympathy now that he’s found he has a soft side now that he’s coerced Cleante into sex in order to save her friend from his sadistic experiments.  Nor am I going to listen to Cleante when she starts sympathising with him as her mind is breaking.  His ‘redemption’ came too late in the game, I think he’s a poor representation of Ford’s Klingons.

Duane’s Romulans / Rihannsu are represented a little better perhaps, but this may be because we don’t see them half as much.  Bonanno seems to have used some key points from Duane’s Romulan development like the term Rihannsu, and the imagery associated with the Praetor / Empire.  Much of what could have been included regarding the Romulans (and perhaps there was more in the first draft) would have been Sulu’s adventure undercover in the Romulan Empire,  but since this is barely touched once introduced (and consequently the results of the investigation is only a confirmation of what they already know – they would have gone to the same place without confirmation anyway), so it isn’t really important in the long run.  I found it interesting that one of the main plot points to Duane’s story My Enemy, My Ally is that the female Romulan/Rihannsu Commander whom Spock tricks in order to get the cloaking device is disgraced and sent into exile,  however in Bonanno’s iteration she still has the favour of the Praetor – surely this is a major change to Rihannsu thought?

All in all, I don’t think Bonanno uses enough Ford and Duane’s ideas to have really warranted her giving them credit at the beginning, although… there is mild influence.  I don’t think the representation of either species is bad though, don’t get me wrong.

Kirk, Spock, McCoy, Uhura, Sulu, Scotty

Odd.  Just Odd.

I don’t know whether it’s because Bonanno is doing her best to keep them out of the limelight, but the established characters are often a little ‘off’.  Out of all of them, I’d say that Scotty and Uhura have the most true to form characterisation.  Uhura certainly feels like she’s presented similarly as in other novels (although some of her dialogue with Spock is a little saccharine), while I could vividly see Scotty on his mission in my minds eye – shame it was so short.

Sulu was… out the way for much of the novel, doing something simultaneously important and unimportant, which ultimately didn’t lead anywhere.  It was kind of annoying really as for once I wanted to know what Sulu was actually doing (my dislike for Takei unfortunately bleeds into my feelings for Sulu) as his mission was the most dynamic of the lot.

Kirk, Spock and McCoy only really get going in the final section of the novel when we’re beaten with the t’hyla stick – but frankly if you hadn’t got that Bonanno has made a parallel couple out of Cleante and T’Shael in order to investigate the depths of the concept of T’hy’la whilst circumventing the radars of certain audiences then perhaps you deserve it.

No need to open her eyes this time.  What little strength she had left she raised one hand.  It was gently embraced by two human hands, and T’Shael’s pain receded in the emanation of love from those hands.

Did she dare smile? If death were to claim her before she could let Cleante know the depth of her gratitude, her yes – call it love – even in the presence of strangers –

For the first time in her life, T’Shael smiled.

“I’m here,” was all Cleante said, and it was all that was needed.

Jim Kirk looked at Spock, who acknowledged the scene in silence before setting the controls (…). 

Sound familiar by any chance?  It’s pretty much a verbatim rendition of Spock and Kirk’s scene in TMP.  This book is also set between TMP and TWOK… Whodathunk.

McCoy knows everything, and even when Kirk is being dense he makes sure to hit him with the t’hy’la hammer:

“(…): whatever happens to her depends in large part on Cleante.  And vice versa.”

Kirk gave him a puzzled look.

“Explain.” 

 “Oh, come on Jim!  You’ve seen it as well as I have, and so has Spock.  These two are forged together for life.  They’re almost a mirror image of you and Spock, both of them falling over each other in self sacrifice.  There’s an old phrase in Latin – amicus usque ad aras. ‘A friend in spite of all differences; a friend to the last extremity.’  There’s even a Vulcan word for it, isn’t there Spock?”

“The word, Doctor is t’hy’la,” Spock murmured, ignoring McCoy’s obtuseness.

There is also a section where McCoy leads Cleante away and sees the same look of devotion in her face as he had seen so many times in Jim Kirk’s.  McCoy’s role here is very much to draw attention to the parallel couples and I guess his character development / exposition is the depth of his understanding of his two closest friends.

So regarding Kirk and Spock… sure they have only a small part to play in this novel ultimately, but despite this the novel is about them or at least their relationship.  Nobody really cares about a couple of one off characters who disappear into the ether at the end of a novel, not really – what do they change ultimately?  Well nothing at all except perhaps our understanding of the term t’hy’la and the personal transformations which take place in a relationship of that depth.

While thinking about Dwellers and the concept of the ‘crucible’ and forging an unbreakable bond, I thought… when was the point that where at least one of them realised he was bound to the other?  When was Kirk and Spock’s ‘crucible’ moment?  I thought about it for a while, but certainly Spock’s ‘moment’ had to be Amok Time; I think that would be the time he realised he was bound to this human for life (that smile when he realises that Kirk is still alive…).  What about Kirk?  Well… like Cleante I think Kirk innately knew and recognised the other part of his soul, perhaps he didn’t think about it in poetic terms until later, but from Kirk’s reactions and the way he looks at Spock from the beginning (aided by Shatner’s phenomenal acting), I think he knew all along.

So yes ultimately Dwellers in the Crucible is a very good, well thought out character study.  A little bit subversive, a lotta bit clever – I would recommend reading it for the questions it asks and for the thoughts it provokes.  However it is not an enjoyable book, I didn’t take a lot of pleasure in reading it and it was at times a chore to read which is not a feeling I like.  I did feel like I was forcing myself to turn the pages, so this leaves me in a strange position.

I didn’t like the book, but I liked the points it made and the questions it evoked… which is why I’m going to give it 3/5!

Star Trek – Shadow Lord

Mr Spock stared at the back of the prince’s head as if he wished he could impress his words directly upon the prince’s brain.  “As painful as life on the border may be, it is a place where change first begins for a culture; and something new and better can be created.”

Bibil opened a jar and proffered it to the prince with a bow of his head.  “As your father said when he sent you on your journey, we must find a way to combine technology of the Federation with our own higher spiritual values.”

Shadow Lord by Laurence Yep (#22 Pocket, Giant Novel – Titan) (1985) is not the finest example of Star Trek fiction; this is mainly because Yep has no interest in actually writing a Star Trek novel.  The result of this is a sword and sorcery novel with Star Trek characters slotted in to enable it to be sold to Pocket books.  I wouldn’t be surprised if the first draft of this novel had a stoic elf sorcerer and his plucky halfling bodyguard in the place of Spock and Sulu.

And I would totally read that book.

Frustratingly, Shadow Lord is  generally well written and I did enjoy it, but if the criteria for ‘well written’ is ‘accurately portrays Star Trek characters and their universe’ then unfortunately it falls flat.

Well Jen, if you seriously enjoyed it, surely this is a success? Well no, questioning voice in my brain, it isn’t.  If I want to read a sword and sorcery novel, I’ll go out and read a sword and sorcery novel, I won’t pick up a Star Trek book, capiche?  Also I read Star Trek novels because I like Star Trek characters so when they are completely out of character (touchy feely, smiley, comforty, Spock for example) then it kinda stops being a Star Trek novel.  I also like the Star Trek universe and the technology, and the spaceships etc. but that doesn’t really feature either in Shadow Lord.  When both of these rather important aspects Star Trek are missing…then how can this be considered a Star Trek novel?

I’ll make it easy for you.  It can’t be.  But… an author’s gotta do what an author’s gotta do, right?

Shadow Lord  was not Laurence Yep’s first publication.  From a brief look at his history, his earliest published work appears to have been in 1968 – although I would be surprised if there were earlier publications.  Yep is a prolific author with plays, novels, and picture books under his belt, he would write and publish very few science fiction stories ultimately (four – one children’s story and three adult), he would later write predominantly fantasy novels (surprise surprise).

So essentially, great writer, wrong genre.  As testament to to his skill he manages to make a ‘bad’ Star Trek book not just readable, but enjoyable.  I would like to know if he actually watched the series properly or if he was involved in the fan community in any way because his image of the characters seems to be quite superficial a lot of the time and yet when we have say an argument between McCoy and Spock, it seems to be on the money.

The story itself is pretty simplistic and run of the mill and… so not anything close to Star Trek.

The premise is that a reluctant prince from a world which technologically is stuck around the seventeenth century and socially… well I’d say they were medieval, is returning home in order to influence his planet’s modernisation under the guidance of the Federation.  However, when he returns to his home planet he finds that the unguided modernisation his father has begun has caused great suffering and poverty and a coup takes place.  The prince escapes with the help of Sulu, Spock and some loyal retainers and makes his way to his family’s land in order to drum up support.  On the way he sees the horrors of his world and decides that although he’d rather stay on the developed worlds of the Federation he must help his people.  The prince gets support from his people, fights a battle where his people win because they have guns and the ‘bad guys’ army have plate armour and swords.  The prince wins a duel using a technique Sulu showed him at the beginning of the novel, and the prince becomes emperor.  The Enterprise returns to pick up its two officers and leaves some of its other crew to help with the modernisation process.

The story isn’t new, it isn’t anything ground breaking, it certainly isn’t inspiring.   It’s pretty much a stock fantasy story sandwiched between two ‘Enterprise’ sections.  It’s a stretch to involve the Federation at all at this point however, I mean they shouldn’t be messing with the development of ‘undeveloped’ worlds in the first place.  Of course this modernisation is going to cause fear and resentment in the people of the planet, they’re barely able to get their heads around the fact aliens exist and when they do the result is xenophobia.  I think this is reasonable when you’ve got an unfathomably big organisation which is unfathomably more developed trying to influence your medieval planet where the height of diplomacy is sticking someone with a sword!

The characterisation, like I mentioned before, can be both strong and weak.  The original characters are better characterised than the established Star Trek characters.

Sulu

Sulu is probably the most natural choice for this story as a representative of the Enterprise / Federation especially when you’re beaming down to a planet where the people live and die by the sword (because of the revelation that he enjoys fencing in the episode ‘Naked Time’).  Personally, when I saw it was a novel where Sulu was going to shine I almost put it down in disappointment.  I generally dislike the characterisation of Sulu and I don’t particularly like George Takei. However, Yep’s characterisation is so off the mark that it makes Sulu palatable, probably the first time I’ve actually praised a bad characterisation.

The reason I wondered if Laurence Yep was involved in the fan community is because his characterisation of Sulu is incredibly ‘fannish’.  There’s like this mythos around Sulu that he’s this sword fighting fanatic with a massive obsession with outdated militaria.  It’s beyond that he’s an expert, it’s highly romanticised.  Most of the time this is emphasized and as a result his science capability and his interest in exotic flora is forgotten.  Despite this ‘fannish’ interpretation, Yep produces a palatable Sulu and made the book readable for me – thank you OOC Sulu!

Spock

Spock is probably the most out of character of the lot, it’s not that he’s too emotional, it’s that he does things that he simply wouldn’t do.  Comforting someone by grasping their shoulder for example, openly smiling.  His major contribution to the novel is to bridge the gap between the prince and his duty.  Spock is used as a ‘child of two worlds’ and is a parallel to the prince who feels the same way, having essentially grown up in the Federation.  After reading a little about Laurence Yep, I realised that Spock (and the prince as well, really) was probably interesting to him as a vehicle to explore his own feelings as a ‘child of two worlds’.  Spock manages to be removed from the action when he takes a spear to the hip (better than an arrow to the knee I suppose), but the situation seems quite forced.  I’m not sure why he needed to be removed from the action, unless Yep really likes Sulu? It’s not like Spock was overpowered or anything in this story, if anything he was underpowered.

Original Characters

Yep’s original characters are probably the strongest (they’re the ones he actually wanted to write after all).  The prince (Vikram) is initially foppish (although this is mainly an act) but proves that he’s actually worthy of running a planet and reforming it.  The character’s development isn’t much of a surprise as it’s all pretty telegraphed including his budding relationship with Urmi, an initially untrustworthy character who learns to love the prince after travelling with him and helping him get to his family’s land.  It just so happened to be that she was his guardian’s (?) niece.

Vikram’s guardian, Bibil, was a likeable character who had a heroic rat beetle related death and was characterised well.  Actually, most of the minor characters were characterised nicely, even if they are introduced for only a couple of pages which I think is testament to Yep’s ability as a writer.  The one character where I’d say it falls down is the villain of the story ‘Lord Rahu’, he’s a bit of a non entity whose actual motivations aren’t really fully realised.  A proxy for Lord Rahu is used much of the time, so although we sympathise with the proxy (a good man, doing the right thing for the wrong reasons) and get to know him, we don’t really learn about Rahu.  Rahu never really achieves the magnitude he needs to be truly effective.

Finally…

Shadow Lord is an enjoyable story if you’re not really expecting to be reading a Star Trek novel.  It doesn’t really add any understanding to the characters, nor does it offer a particularly inspiring sci-fi / Star Trek scenario.  It’s hard for me to say ‘don’t read it’ because despite its many flaws I found it enjoyable, on the other hand it’s not really a successful Trek novel and I don’t think you’re missing o out on a dose of Trek if you don’t bother with this one.

1/5 – Sorry!

Star Trek – The Tears of the Singers

“Wait,” Maslin said, eyeing her curiously.  “You’re not like these vapid socialites.  What are you?”

She found it odd that he asked her what rather than who she was, but she ignored it, and answered, “I’m a Star Fleet officer assigned to U.S.S. Enterprise.”

“Impressive, if one happens to be awed by that institution.  But what’s a technocrat like you doing at one of my concerts, Madam Star Fleet?”

The Tears of the Singers (1984) (#19 Pocket, #39 Titan) was Melinda Snodgrass’ first published novel.  Snodgrass would later become a prolific writer and still writes today under both her own name and pen names.  Snodgrass notably wrote the script for for TNG’s The Measure of a Man, which was nominated for the Writer’s Guild Award for outstanding writing in a drama series.

The Tears of the Singers is overall a good book.  It’s well conceived and hints at the brilliant writer Snodgrass would become, however, it does regularly hiccup and suffer from an occasional heavy handedness which becomes a little wearisome.  Pacing is also a problem throughout this novel, which could be a symptom of Snodgrass’ immaturity as a writer and her difficulty in writing the quantity of characters she does.  Her writing also suffers somewhat from a certain ‘blandness‘, and it’s unfortunate that she should use a character concept similar to characters in  Diane Duane’s The Wounded Sky – when compared to Duane’s colourful language, Snodgrass’ falls short.

And that all sounds very negative I know, but I needed to get it out of my system first.

Saying all that, I need to stress that The Tears of the Singers isn’t a bad book, however unlike The Wounded Sky or The Final Reflection it doesn’t shine as bright.  When Snodgrass writes well, it’s inspired and she can get the image or the characterisation across quickly and easily… succinctly I guess?  Her characterisations are generally good, although at times a little cliched, and she does paint fine scenes with her words.  Her approach is a little formulaic and almost a ‘tick box’ Star Trek novel, but that might work in her favour a little bit as it keeps the plot moving though it makes it rather predictable all told.

Ah… the reason perhaps that I’m struggling here is because every time I think of something complimentary, I can think of two or three other things that really let the book down, and that is so frustrating!

The ‘Singers’ are pretty much these…

The Tears of the Singers is a thinly veiled eco-fable at heart, which is drawing particularly on the practice of seal clubbing – a particularly revolting ‘hunt’ (if you can even call it that) where men go out on the ice and club seals to death (or not, in some cases), in order to acquire meat and an unbroken pelt, sometimes under the guise of ‘conservation’.  The first major protests against the practice can be seen as far back as 1967, and in 1983 the EU (European Union) banned the import of white coat harp seal pup pelts (pelts from pups under two weeks of age).  More recently (2009) the EU has banned the import of all seal products, causing the value of pelts to fall from $100 to between $8 and $15 each.

Why would I go into all that?  Well, aside from standing on my soapbox, it’s because the crux of The Tears of the Singers is that hunters have been killing a seal like creature for the tears they shed at the moment of death, which solidify into gems which have become popular throughout the Federation with the wealthy… and you’d have to be wealthy since the small number of gems available fetch extortionate prices.  These creatures were deemed non-intelligent during a survey and thus are fair game to hunters greedy for easy money.  However we find out during the course of the novel that the survey of the planet and the Taygetians was cursory at best and that the creatures are in fact a people, devoted to singing a hymn of salvation for their people, bending time and space to protect their planet.  The hunters disrupt their song by killing the adults which causes their song to become discordant, causing a rift in space time, the rift of course is what causes Star Fleet to send the Enterprise to investigate the anomaly.

This however, is not the whole story.  Since this is a boarder planet between the Federation and Klingon space, the Klingons have also noticed the anomaly and sent two ships to investigate.  It just so happens that the leader of expedition is Kor, the same Kor as involved in the incident with the Organians.  Kor, it turns out, is having trouble with mutineers (even with a loyal captain on the second Klingon ship), who disagree with his more peaceful, co-operative approach.  Kor recognises Klingon shortcomings and realises that working with Kirk and his scientists would be the only way to solve the problem of this dangerous phenomenon.  Eventually however, the Klingons act predictably and mutiny causing trouble for the Enterprise and the Klingon officers.

The romantic sub-plot concerns Uhura and a mercurial musical genius Mozart Maslin.  Although it is nice to see Uhura take a more active, almost ‘lead’ role for the first time in the Pocket Books series, this narrative thread is also one of the most irritating.  Essentially Mozart Maslin is drafted in to help the Enterprise solve the musical conundrum of the singers, he’s not happy with it and is generally bad tempered, and egotistical.  Somehow, Uhura falls in love with this particularly irritating little man, who also conveniently (from a narrative perspective) happens to be quite ill, and this final musical problem will be his requiem.  I suppose love doesn’t have to be sensible, but not unlike the abominable JJ movie Uhura, love makes her stupid and disobedient.  Now, I’m no ‘feminist’ (let’s settle for egalitarian, shall we? This is not up for debate), and my reaction will generally be ‘suck it up buttercup’ as opposed to some sort of militant defence or righteous outrage, but it frustrates me that you can have a template like Uhura and still mess up characterisation!  I mean, I can almost forgive a male author for cocking up a female character, but it’s just mystifying how a woman can write Uhura as a main character and make her into a… a…. spineless, gooey, love struck fool of a woman who lashes out at her captain for doing the right thing.  That isn’t the Uhura we know!  Well, the lack of professionalism, foolish, prissy little girl character sums up the JJ Uhura, but not the TOS Uhura!

Now, perhaps this wouldn’t be so bad if there wasn’t a balancing female representative on the Klingon vessels, but there is… Kor’s wife.  Unfortunately, she isn’t characterised successfully either, in fact, the way she’s written actually emphasises the problems with Uhura’s characterisation.  The Klingon romantic subplot isn’t too much better.  Kali (Kor’s new, young, wife) is… essentially a go-between, a bridge between the Klingon parties and the Federation representatives, but she serves more to highlight Kor’s abnormality than a character in her own right, though she does have her moments.  I was a little disappointed that Snodgrass decided to make her a ‘strong because of love’ type character as opposed to ‘strong because capable’ (which she doesn’t seem to be).  She does redeem herself near the end of the book however and saves the Enterprise contingent, which was a relief.

I’ve already mentioned Uhura’s flaws as regards to her role in the romance sub-plot, but how does she react on her own?  Unfortunately, Maslin is by necessity introduced very early and Uhura’s character is basically represented and expanded on via her relationship with Maslin.  Instead of being Madam Starfleet and doing her job as an officer, she quickly degenerates into Maslin’s tag-along.  She serves a purpose, sure, she is the only one who can get Maslin to listen, and she looks after him because of his ailing health, although by the end she is also redundant in this way.  Maslin does change, he understands and listens to Kirk and the other officers and his health deteriorates beyond the point of no return.   Uhura caught in the throws of love forgets duty, her dreams, her discipline, her ability as an officer in order to take the typically female role of carer, mother, empathic.  I don’t think she really even truly contributes to the work of deciphering the language of the seal people, Maslin and Spock do most of the work.  While I don’t begrudge a woman being caring, emotional, and/or in love, I really didn’t enjoy Uhura’s characterisation in this as she just became a little too malleable and didn’t seem to retain enough of what I would consider herself in her interactions with other characters.

Maslin, otherwise known as Mozart is an insufferable character who gets some character growth but overall makes you seriously dubious about Uhura’s taste in men.  He is an arrogant, selfish, mercurial man who is unfortunately talented enough to get away with it.  He does have some redeeming qualities in that he is a hard worker however, I feel that he isn’t so much working hard for the good of others, but for the achievement of working out a puzzle, that’s what motivates him.  I think he’s a good character but I disliked him because he was just, so irritating.  I both liked and disliked his growth in the end that he would end up accepting that Starfleet wasn’t as he perceived it to be after all.

Kirk, Spock, and McCoy were pretty standard characterisations.  Kirk was quite passive for much of the novel (much to his chagrin), Spock was ever pragmatic, and McCoy was the emotional ‘heart’.  They basically worked in  their standard dynamic where Kirk has to make a decision (this time, regarding Maslin and his health / sacrifice of one for many or few for the many) and Spock and McCoy come in on opposing sides of the argument.

Kirk of course does get his action, and proves that what he expects of Maslin is something he himself would do – and more.  Their final experience focuses on Kirk, so I imagine he is mollified!

There are two sets of antagonists in The Tears of the Singers, firstly the human hunters who are pretty much the kind of people you’d imagine who would club baby seals to death for money and who get dealt with satisfactorily.  Secondly there are the the Klingons, who are pretty well behaved for much of the novel – until Kor’s second in command decides to incite mutiny in the two Klingon ships.  Kor’s problem is mainly that he has grown to disagree with the Klingon Empire’s policies, and… he likes Kirk and grows to like the the humans he meets as representatives of the Federation.  His young wife is also forward thinking and significantly more empathic than the average Klingon.  I mean, sure, they have no problem with executing people, but certainly they are cuddly Klingons.  Ultimately, I liked Kor, he is reasonable and pragmatic and someone I’d definitely have a drink with!

Kind of like how small groups of Romulans can get along with the Enterprise crew too… and their crews mutiny…

Finally…

Although Snodgrass sort to expand the character of Uhura, she ends up falling short and limiting her (Uhura) by her own narrow horizons and by using plot elements that had been used before and better.  Uhura ends up still caught in this web of generic female characterisation, which is disappointing coming from a female author who has deliberately placed her as the supposed centre of her story.  Uhura ends up defined by a male character which is galling, considering in the 60s she was defined by her own parametres, not that of a man and here we see in the 80s a step backwards where her ‘leading’ role is as a support to a weak but talented man who arguably is actually the main character.

On a particularly immature and disappointing note is Uhura’s consideration of whether she has to become a lesbian to be a captain.  Oh Snodgrass, did you feel a little bit naughty using the term lesbian?

Generally my feelings for this book can be summed up with ‘but someone else did it better’, and that someone else happens to be Diane Duane.  Uhura’s sections of The Wounded Sky for example, do more for the characterisation of Uhura than the whole of The Tears of the Singers.

3/5 – disappointing but worth a read (probably).

Star Trek – The Trellisane Confrontation

Kirk had been staring into space, not lost in thought, but helpless and hopeless, stunned by the loss of his ship.  He had never felt quite so abandoned, so lost, his very foundation removed.  McCoy leaned toward him and said softly, “Jim.  Captain Kirk!”

I have to say I was elated on reading The Trellisane Confrontation by David Dvorkin (1984) (#14 Pocket, #31 Titan), after all I was bracing myself for a literary blooper after having three excellent books on the trot.  After the hit and miss approach to the first ten books in the series, I have to admit I was getting a little downhearted at the prospect of having to suffer more of the same in books #11 to #20.  Honestly, it’s like they turned a corner at Web of the Romulans, hopefully they don’t look back?

That isn’t to say The Trellisane Confrontation doesn’t have problems, it does… a surprising amount in fact considering how short it is but it does have more of a feeling of an episode than the previous three books, which felt like they could never really be episodes (I acknowledge The Wounded Sky was adapted to a certain extent for an episode in TNG).

Okok, note on the cover.  Accurate uniform on Spock, this novel takes place in 2269, so during the original five year mission.  I actually like this cover a lot, it’s colourful, it’s fun… it’s… who is that woman in the middle?  I was waiting for a damsel to appear but uhm… she doesn’t?  I had a thought that it was supposed to be Chapel, but then why not put her in uniform, and I don’t really think she fits the description of the warrior women of Nactern either, other than those mentioned and other than Uhura (who it most definitely isn’t) there aren’t any other female characters?

Edit:  Ok, people seem to think it’s Christine Chapel…  I’ll believe them, I suppose Spock looks facially squiffy too…

The Trellisane Confrontation follows a quite a simple plot.  The Enterprise is transporting dangerous criminals who are affiliated to a political faction who wish the Federation to go to war with the Romulans.  Whilst transporting them, Kirk decides to go to the aid of a peaceful, neutral, planet being attacked by it’s aggressive sister planet in a system in a precarious position between the three powers (Federation, Klingon Empire, Romulan Star Empire).  Spock and McCoy express their reservations about going to aid this planet with dangerous prisoners on board, but Kirk is adamant and proceeds without confirmation from Starfleet.

Naturally, everything goes wrong.  The prisoners on the Enterprise escape and gain control of the ship in order to try to start a war with the Romulans while Kirk, Spock and McCoy are on Trellisane.  The Trellisane people are not the peaceful progressive people they appear to be, the attacking Sealons and Klingons step up their invasion plans, and Spock and Kirk are captured by the Klingon and Sealon forces, leaving McCoy to organise a the Trellisane people and uncover their dark secrets.

That’s the set up for The Trellisane Confrontation, and although a little simplistic at times the first half is a pretty strong and enjoyable read.  The pacing is good, it doesn’t sweat the small stuff and expects the reader to fill in some gaps.  However, in the second half of the novel Dvorkin appears to lose impetus and aside from a very interesting section with Christine Chapel melding with an alien it doesn’t have many other high points, in fact I became quite irritable about some inconsistencies I couldn’t un-see!  The novel resolves itself a little too quickly not allowing Dvorkin to really get the meat (ha) of his story.  We get a need to know exposition via McCoy of the Trellisane culture, a rather pathetic bunch who are essentially cowards and cannibals.  The Sealons, the species being manipulated by the Klingons turn out to be a bit on the rough side but rather more likeable than the Trellisane people, despite never hearing a word directly out of their mouths.  The political situation gets resolved in a couple of pages… and Klingons and Romulans beam straight onto the bridge for discussions?

My main complaint however is what I can only suggest are strange, loose, narrative threads that by the end of The Trellisane Confrontation are not resolved.  The odd moralising at the end which attempts to give an illusion of tying those threads but really just leaves them broken.  This is really shame because it really does spoil the book, in my estimation, after a well paced and pleasant first half.

Here’s an example; Spock notices behaviour he doesn’t like in Kirk, and this rattles him and his confidence in Kirk.  Personally I didn’t see a problem or out of the ordinary behaviour, but I ran with it.  I spent from that time onwards waiting for some sort of revelation that something was wrong with Kirk, like, there’s something in the air on Trellisane, or there was something in that delicious delicious meat her ate… but it’s nothing.  It turns out that Spock hero-worships Kirk and just hadn’t seen this aspect of him before…  We are in the same year as The City on the Edge of Forever guys…  you know each other quite well at this point!

Spock followed him, and as Kirk leaned over to offer him a hand to help, Spock was amazed to see that his captain’s face wore a broad grin.  It was something beyond simple levity or the release of long suppressed tension, Spock thought; it seemed more the joy of a young boy on a long-awaited long-delayed holiday.

(…)

Now, suddenly, the control seemed to have disappeared.  In this earnest, deadly business, James Kirk was behaving with boyish glee rather than the calm determination Spock night have expected.  Kirk was dropping to the level of the average human, and Spock, who would have been greatly insulted had anyone suggested to him that he was capable of hero worship, was deeply disturbed. 

 This actually connects with analysis of the criminal who takes control of the Enterprise.  In several sections the criminal (Hander) is likened to Kirk and in a final exchange with Spock and McCoy, they underscore their similarities.  Now, I might be a Kirk devotee, but I think this is a bit of a stretch and Spock and McCoy’s final condemnation? criticism? of Kirk’s character and actions during the events of the novel was quite inaccurate and very unfair.  Kirk was right to be angry about what they were saying!

The slave/cannibal aspect of the Trellisanians was interesting, especially when reflected by McCoy.  I particularly liked the ‘not all as things appear theme’ which was prevalent, and probably does the best job at holding the story together.

The subplot (?) on the Enterprise where Hander Morl and his five alien allies take control of the bridge was actually pretty enjoyable, and I especially relished my least favourite character Sulu being the one to cock up utterly and cause the whole situation.  Chekov’s scenes were excellent, and his trying to emulate Kirk was wonderfully written and very funny.  Uhura was very much in the background but what did surprise me was as mentioned before, Chapel’s section.  I think that was very well done although ultimately she doesn’t reveal her experiences.

Ultimately, The Trellisane Confrontation is an enjoyable book and well worth a read.  It doesn’t reach the heights of The Wounded Sky or the tension of Mutiny on the Enterprise, this book is smaller in scope and less detailed than the previous couple of novels.  Characters are a little out of character at times, although Dvorkin seems to be better at characterising the likes of Sulu and Chekov than Spock and Kirk.  Action is a little disjointed and at times frustratingly sparse on details, but not necessarily bad.  I don’t think The Trellisane Confrontation adds anything to the existing characters, Dvorkin does create an interesting culture in the Trellisane species.

3/5 – don’t order the steak.

Star Trek – The Abode of Life

Two nearly simultaneous explosions from the humanoids’ handguns shook the glade.  There was the solid sound of a projectile hitting one of the trees, followed by the whistling of another projectile ricocheting off some surface to warble off into the distance.

White smoke having the smell of rotten eggs, the characteristic odor of exploded black gunpowder, filled the air.

Oh dear, it has been a while!  I’m afraid I was on a bodily enforced hiatus – it was either mild flu or a cold with delusions of grandeur!  Either way it wiped me out for weeks (I’m only now feeling awake enough to write again!), and considering I’d pretty much finished The Abode of Life when I came down with it, I’m now having to stretch my Trek addled brain far further back than I’d like in order to review it!

The Abode of Life (Pocket, Titan) by Lee Correy was a welcome break from the overly dramatic silliness of Marshak & Culbreath and also allowed me to legitimately avoid reading another two that I’m not very excited about, to say the least.  Ok, what I really want to say is that I needed a man’s literary touch and Lee Corey managed to scratch that itch.  I’ve often said that there is a definite difference between male and female writers and it couldn’t be more exemplified than in the comparison between the emotional writing of Marshak and Culbreath and the succinct prose of Lee Correy.  The Abode of Life is spartan and Correy is generally uninterested in emotional exposition or character development (he in fact seems to have difficulty expressing emotion at all -Vulcan?-, I’ll talk about that later), instead his interest lies in writing an expanded episode, showing us a whole new culture and having Kirk and the crew of the Enterprise make first contact with a technologically advanced species so cut off from the rest of the galaxy that they believe they are the only sentient life and whose culture is built around that belief.

The cover is… ok? I kind of like Kirk and Spock being full length instead of floating heads though…

I don’t want to give the wrong impression, I really did like The Abode of Life, it was just what I needed and that’s all right with me.  As much as I like character driven stories full of exposition and relationship / character building, sometimes I just need to be reminded just why I like the series in the first place.  Essentially, it’s very easy to get bogged down with ‘fanon‘ (which is wonderful) that you forget just why it was love at first sight.  I didn’t get annoyed, I didn’t get emotional, I just got taken on a Trek adventure

The author is worth mentioning before I move on.  Lee Corey is a pseudonym of G. Harry Stine who as well as an author is one of the founding figures of modern model rocketry.  He has a physics background and worked at the Naval Ordnance Missile Test facility.  The Abode of Life is his only Star Trek novel, however he wrote a number of novels including his ‘Warbot’ series.  He has also published non fiction books on model rocketry and a number of space / space travel related books.  His non-fiction writing style peeks through in The Abode of Life, economical with language, a general lack of emotional description but a really in depth creation of a world and a culture and the possible science behind it.  Lee Correy writes plausibly, everything is believable from the science to the reactions of the characters.

The Enterprise is asked to scout a dangerous area of space full of spacial gravitational distortions.  Naturally, in an encounter with one of these distortions the Enterprise gets thrown across space to a sector of the quadrant which has not been yet discovered / explored by any other known race.  Badly crippled by the ordeal, the Enterprise limps under impulse engines to a lone planet circling a lone star, the readings of which defy even Spock’s understanding of star behaviour.  It soon becomes clear that the star and the planet were victims of the same phenomenon that the Enterprise experienced, albeit many years previously, explaining the odd behaviour of the star.

Due to the state of the Enterprise, Kirk makes the decision that he must make contact with the people on the surface of the planet.  Scans indicate they are technologically advanced and use a transporter system though they have not developed space travel.  Kirk finds himself in a first contact situation with a people who have no concept of any other life in the universe except for their own, and whose unique society could be irrevocably changed by contact with aliens…  Of course, the situation becomes more urgent when it is revealed that the unstable sun is due to start a cyclical event which will cause it to throw out lethal amounts of radiation, enough to destroy a crippled starship and her crew.  Kirk must decide whether to break the cycle and change a planet’s society forever, or save the Enterprise from certain destruction, all the while playing the part of Federation ambassador and tactician.

It’s pretty much a no-brainer, isn’t it?  I mean, even those of us who will defend Kirk to the ends of the Alpha quadrant know that there are certain things he won’t allow:

1) Destruction of his woman the Enterprise (unless it involves Spock, see 3))

2) Loss of his best bro, McCoy

3) Loss of his space husband first officer, Spock.

So once the negotiations inevitably break down, Kirk has to take action.  In doing so he changes Mercan forever, which of course means that the story doesn’t stop there.  The Abode of Life is unusual as it continues on well after the main event has occurred, Kirk has to take responsibility for his actions, and that means helping to mend the rifts between the various factions on the planet and try to bring the isolated planet into the Federation for protection and for strategic purposes.

Much of the action The Abode of Life comes from the conflict between three factions which can probably be described simply as conservatives, liberals and military.  In this case the conservatives hold the power in the Mercan society being part of a ‘church of science’ (?) and they hold the knowledge of how to predict their sun’s behaviour and have control of the bunkers which the people have to hide in to survive.  The liberals represent ‘new-science’, challenging old views and trying to work out what the conservatives know in order to shift the balance of power.  The military are pretty self explanatory, they work for the conservatives but only want to act for the good of Mercan.

Pretty standard fare isn’t it?  The meat of the story itself is not original, but the setting is.  I think the real strength comes from the Correy’s world building.  His new characters are average, but the well thought out world with it’s interesting martial society and mix of new technology (world wide transporter system) and old (black powder pistols) is really interesting.  I actually liked the idea of this isolated, advanced society having this duelling system that uses old pistols to settle disputes.  The ‘mythology’ of the planet was really interesting too, after all, there had to be a reason they didn’t ever bother developing space travel and such. 

One of the points I had to laugh at was the characterisations, they were accurate I think, but because Correy’s weakness is description you get funny repetitions like ‘Kirk snapped’.  ‘Kirk snapped’ was used so many times that it kind of becomes a joke.  Does Kirk do nothing else but ‘snap’ as his crew?  It’s like he’s suffering a sugar low or something!!

It was nice having Kirk just being a captain and demonstrating how capable he is.  You know showing you just why he’s is the captain of a starship charged with not only the responsibility of the 400 or so lives on board, but as a soldier and as a negotiator and representative of the Federation – a diplomat able to initiate and preside over first contact situations.  Correy really emphasises Kirk’s sense of responsibility and his wisdom. 

Correy used a wide selection of the main cast, including Rand, who gets to be part of the landing party.  I’m actually rather fond of Janice Rand and when she is written into a story it tends to be rather satisfying for me.

The Abode of Life is really worth the read, it’s just good, solid, Trek.  What more do you want?

4/5 – Kirk snapped.